EDU 343 WebQuest Grading Rubric
|
Essential Elements |
Excellent(A) |
Average (B) |
Unacceptable (C) |
|
Introduction (3 points) |
The introduction draws the reader into the lesson by relating the learner's interests or goals &/or engagingly describing a compelling question or problem. |
The introduction relates somewhat to the learner's interests &/or describes a compelling question or problem. |
The introduction is purely factual with no appeal to relevance or social importance.
|
|
Task (5 points) |
-Task is engaging, & elicits thinking that goes beyond rote comprehension. -The task requires synthesis of multiple sources of information, &/0r taking a position, &/or going beyond the data given & making a generalization or creative product. |
-Task is doable but is limited in its significance to students' lives. -The task requires analysis of information &/or putting together information from several sources. |
The task requires simply comprehending or retelling of information found on web pages & answering factual questions. |
|
Process (5 points) |
-Every step is clearly stated. -Most students would know exactly where they are at each step of the process & know what to do next. |
-Some direction are given, but there is missing information. -Students might be confused. |
-Process is not clearly stated. -Students would not know exactly what they were supposed to do just from reading this. |
|
Resources (5 points) |
- Links make excellent use of the Webs timeliness & colorfulness. - Varies resources provide enough meaningful information for students to think deeply. |
Some links carry information not ordinarily found in a classroom. |
Links are mundane. They lead to information that could be found in a classroom encyclopedia. |
|
Evaluation (5 points) |
- Criteria for success are clearly stated in the form of a rubric or checklist. - The evaluation instrument clearly measures what students must know & be able to do to accomplish the task. |
Criteria for success are at least partially described. |
Criteria for success are not described. |
| Conclusion
(2 point) |
Includes summary statement or story
Reminds student what they should have accomplished |
Includes summary statement or story | Does not include a conclusion |
|
Visual Aesthetics (5 points) |
-Appropriate & thematic graphic elements are used to make visual connections that contribute to the understanding of concepts, ideas & relationships. -Differences in type size and/or color are used well & consistently |
- Graphic elements sometimes, but not always contribute to the understanding of concepts, ideas & relationships. - There is some variation in type size, color, and layout |
There are few or no graphic elements. No variation in layout or typography Or Color is harsh and/or typographic variation are overused and legibility suffers. Background interferes with the readability. |
|
Navigation & Flow (5 points) |
Navigation is seamless. It is always clear to the learner what all the pieces are and how to get to them. |
There are some broken links, misplaced or missing images, or badly sized tables. |
There are more than 5 broken links, misplaced or missing images, or badly sized tables. |
|
Miscellaneous (5 points) |
Content clearly would link to the MCF. Content clearly links to the expanding horizons curricular design. Content and tasks are developmentally appropriate. Included a rubric Included a graphic organizer to guide research Less than two grammar errors |
Content only marginally related to the MCF Developmentally appropriate Included a rubric Included a graphic organizer to guide research Three or Four grammar errors |
No link to the MCF or Expanding horizons curricular design. Tasks & content not developmentally appropriate. Included a rubric or graphic organizer Five or more grammar errors |
Copyright (C) Renay M. Scott, Ph.D (2004)
For questions or comments you can contact the author at: Scott1rm@cmich.edu